OFCCP v Medtronic Provides Federal Contractors/subcontractors a learning opportunity in Compensation Practices

Last month, Medtronic and the OFCCP settled pay discrimination allegations in Interventional Vascular Inc. which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Medtronic Inc., Case No. 2013-OFC-0004. Many of you may know the basic facts: the OFCCP alleged that Medtronic discriminated against 78 Hispanic entry-level Senior Production Associates at its Danvers, Massachusetts facility, by paying them less…
Read More

EEOC v. Freeman: How Not to Handle a “Disparate Impact” Case

by Ahmed Younies Judge Roger Titus’ scathing opinion in EEOC v. Freeman 09-CV 2573 (D. MD August 9, 2013) is a lesson to any plaintiff, be it a government agency or an individual in how not to handle disparate impact cases. Factual and Procedural History of the Case Freeman (a nationwide convention, exhibition and corporate events…
Read More

”Non-Asians” are not a race – OFCCP v VF Jeanswear

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruled against the OFCCP, granting VF Jeanswear Limited Partnership summary judgment in a disparate impact case. The OFCCP accused VF Jeanswear of engaging in employment practices having a disparate impact on “non-Asians”, violating Executive Order 11246 and federal regulations. The ALJ reasoned that “non-Asians” are not a “race” within the…
Read More